(no subject)
Dec. 13th, 2006 11:52 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
commotiocordisLOL at this article.
Soy is making kids 'gay'
Jim Rutz
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53327
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: December 12, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
There's a slow poison out there that's severely damaging our children and threatening to tear apart our culture. The ironic part is, it's a "health food," one of our most popular.
Now, I'm a health-food guy, a fanatic who seldom allows anything into his kitchen unless it's organic. I state my bias here just so you'll know I'm not anti-health food.
The dangerous food I'm speaking of is soy. Soybean products are feminizing, and they're all over the place. You can hardly escape them anymore.
I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you're also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.
Estrogens are female hormones. If you're a woman, you're flooding your system with a substance it can't handle in surplus. If you're a man, you're suppressing your masculinity and stimulating your "female side," physically and mentally.
In fetal development, the default is being female. All humans (even in old age) tend toward femininity. The main thing that keeps men from diverging into the female pattern is testosterone, and testosterone is suppressed by an excess of estrogen.
If you're a grownup, you're already developed, and you're able to fight off some of the damaging effects of soy. Babies aren't so fortunate. Research is now showing that when you feed your baby soy formula, you're giving him or her the equivalent of five birth control pills a day. A baby's endocrine system just can't cope with that kind of massive assault, so some damage is inevitable. At the extreme, the damage can be fatal.
Soy is feminizing, and commonly leads to a decrease in the size of the penis, sexual confusion and homosexuality. That's why most of the medical (not socio-spiritual) blame for today's rise in homosexuality must fall upon the rise in soy formula and other soy products. (Most babies are bottle-fed during some part of their infancy, and one-fourth of them are getting soy milk!) Homosexuals often argue that their homosexuality is inborn because "I can't remember a time when I wasn't homosexual." No, homosexuality is always deviant. But now many of them can truthfully say that they can't remember a time when excess estrogen wasn't influencing them.
Doctors used to hope soy would reduce hot flashes, prevent cancer and heart disease, and save millions in the Third World from starvation. That was before they knew much about long-term soy use. Now we know it's a classic example of a cure that's worse than the disease. For example, if your baby gets colic from cow's milk, do you switch him to soy milk? Don't even think about it. His phytoestrogen level will jump to 20 times normal. If he is a she, brace yourself for watching her reach menarche as young as seven, robbing her of years of childhood. If he is a boy, it's far worse: He may not reach puberty till much later than normal.
Research in 2000 showed that a soy-based diet at any age can lead to a weak thyroid, which commonly produces heart problems and excess fat. Could this explain the dramatic increase in obesity today?
Recent research on rats shows testicular atrophy, infertility and uterus hypertrophy (enlargement). This helps explain the infertility epidemic and the sudden growth in fertility clinics. But alas, by the time a soy-damaged infant has grown to adulthood and wants to marry, it's too late to get fixed by a fertility clinic.
Worse, there's now scientific evidence that estrogen ingredients in soy products may be boosting the rapidly rising incidence of leukemia in children. In the latest year we have numbers for, new cases in the U.S. jumped 27 percent. In one year!
There's also a serious connection between soy and cancer in adults – especially breast cancer. That's why the governments of Israel, the UK, France and New Zealand are already cracking down hard on soy.
In sad contrast, 60 percent of the refined foods in U.S. supermarkets now contain soy. Worse, soy use may double in the next few years because (last I heard) the out-of-touch medicrats in the FDA hierarchy are considering allowing manufacturers of cereal, energy bars, fake milk, fake yogurt, etc., to claim that "soy prevents cancer." It doesn't.
P.S.: Soy sauce is fine. Unlike soy milk, it's perfectly safe because it's fermented, which changes its molecular structure. Miso, natto and tempeh are also OK, but avoid tofu.
Soy is making kids 'gay'
Jim Rutz
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53327
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: December 12, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
There's a slow poison out there that's severely damaging our children and threatening to tear apart our culture. The ironic part is, it's a "health food," one of our most popular.
Now, I'm a health-food guy, a fanatic who seldom allows anything into his kitchen unless it's organic. I state my bias here just so you'll know I'm not anti-health food.
The dangerous food I'm speaking of is soy. Soybean products are feminizing, and they're all over the place. You can hardly escape them anymore.
I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you're also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.
Estrogens are female hormones. If you're a woman, you're flooding your system with a substance it can't handle in surplus. If you're a man, you're suppressing your masculinity and stimulating your "female side," physically and mentally.
In fetal development, the default is being female. All humans (even in old age) tend toward femininity. The main thing that keeps men from diverging into the female pattern is testosterone, and testosterone is suppressed by an excess of estrogen.
If you're a grownup, you're already developed, and you're able to fight off some of the damaging effects of soy. Babies aren't so fortunate. Research is now showing that when you feed your baby soy formula, you're giving him or her the equivalent of five birth control pills a day. A baby's endocrine system just can't cope with that kind of massive assault, so some damage is inevitable. At the extreme, the damage can be fatal.
Soy is feminizing, and commonly leads to a decrease in the size of the penis, sexual confusion and homosexuality. That's why most of the medical (not socio-spiritual) blame for today's rise in homosexuality must fall upon the rise in soy formula and other soy products. (Most babies are bottle-fed during some part of their infancy, and one-fourth of them are getting soy milk!) Homosexuals often argue that their homosexuality is inborn because "I can't remember a time when I wasn't homosexual." No, homosexuality is always deviant. But now many of them can truthfully say that they can't remember a time when excess estrogen wasn't influencing them.
Doctors used to hope soy would reduce hot flashes, prevent cancer and heart disease, and save millions in the Third World from starvation. That was before they knew much about long-term soy use. Now we know it's a classic example of a cure that's worse than the disease. For example, if your baby gets colic from cow's milk, do you switch him to soy milk? Don't even think about it. His phytoestrogen level will jump to 20 times normal. If he is a she, brace yourself for watching her reach menarche as young as seven, robbing her of years of childhood. If he is a boy, it's far worse: He may not reach puberty till much later than normal.
Research in 2000 showed that a soy-based diet at any age can lead to a weak thyroid, which commonly produces heart problems and excess fat. Could this explain the dramatic increase in obesity today?
Recent research on rats shows testicular atrophy, infertility and uterus hypertrophy (enlargement). This helps explain the infertility epidemic and the sudden growth in fertility clinics. But alas, by the time a soy-damaged infant has grown to adulthood and wants to marry, it's too late to get fixed by a fertility clinic.
Worse, there's now scientific evidence that estrogen ingredients in soy products may be boosting the rapidly rising incidence of leukemia in children. In the latest year we have numbers for, new cases in the U.S. jumped 27 percent. In one year!
There's also a serious connection between soy and cancer in adults – especially breast cancer. That's why the governments of Israel, the UK, France and New Zealand are already cracking down hard on soy.
In sad contrast, 60 percent of the refined foods in U.S. supermarkets now contain soy. Worse, soy use may double in the next few years because (last I heard) the out-of-touch medicrats in the FDA hierarchy are considering allowing manufacturers of cereal, energy bars, fake milk, fake yogurt, etc., to claim that "soy prevents cancer." It doesn't.
P.S.: Soy sauce is fine. Unlike soy milk, it's perfectly safe because it's fermented, which changes its molecular structure. Miso, natto and tempeh are also OK, but avoid tofu.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-02-22 04:51 am (UTC)I heard you say you were doing that, right, so I did it (because it really is much more convenient and neat) and (*facepalm*) didn't realise that the number of new emails wouldn't show up when I signed in, so here I am getting all sad because I've had absolutely NO comments/replies/emails from anyone since last night, when really I had 20 sitting there waiting. I have to remind myself to actually go to my Hotmail page and check the Comments folder.
And yes, I've got tons from you (that 59 was actually really inaccurate, because there were comments there that I just hadn't deleted after replying. But give us a week or two and we could bump the number up again, I'm sure)
Well, that lasted long. *luffs you too much to stay away*
And so I'm glad! Who else would I talk endlessly to? Who else will I reply to even when it's not my post to begin with? Who else will I 'ship femslash with? Who else will I write House episodes with? WHO WILL BETA MY FICS? WHO WILL GIVE ME HISTORY LESSONS ON GUYS WITH FUNNY RULES ABOUT HATS? AHHH. *clings* I luff my Alexandria.
Sometimes I download them before listening to them if somebody says that it's good
Me too. My friend Rachell is always telling me to download some song or another. And even though she has some different tastes, she just knows what I would or wouldn't like, so it's good.
women with male GPs who get conditions that are somewhat personal probably let them get worse before mentioning them than women with female doctors do, because the ones with girldocs are more comfortable talking to them.
That's so true. D'you reckon the same goes for men with female doctors? 'Cause there'd be the understandable embarrassment if it's something personal (like, involving sex or their genitals, I'm guessing) but then, would there be a pride/embarrassment thing with male doctors too? It's hard to think like a man if you're not actually male. Hmm.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 07:27 am (UTC)Urgh. That's annoying. With Yahoo, it pops up right next to the inbox listing on the first page after you log in. It's all "Inbox (1), Bulk (1520), Unreplied LJ Comments (12)." (For some reason I get huge amounts of junk mail. Ticks me off. Yahoo filters most of it straight into the bulk folder, but the fact that I get so much bugs me. I found that if I leave it alone and don't delete any of the bulk mail in the folder, its autodelete thing tends to keep it up around 6000 or so. Scary. Leave me alone, bad bulkmailertypes.)
WHO WILL GIVE ME HISTORY LESSONS ON GUYS WITH FUNNY RULES ABOUT HATS?
OMG. I totally forgot about that. Hee! I love that guy! Man, we are so cool, you know that? Our conversations are about the best stuff. We win. At life.
D'you reckon the same goes for men with female doctors? 'Cause there'd be the understandable embarrassment if it's something personal (like, involving sex or their genitals, I'm guessing)
I don't think so as much. Because women have the motherly thing going on. They'd prolly be uncomfortable going to a sexpot female doctor, but in general, I think they're more okay with it than we'd be. However, I, as you may have guessed, am not intimately familiar with the workings of the inner man as related to doctors. Still, especially if they went to a female pediatrician/family doctor (like I know a lot of young males do because their siblings/mother went to the same person for the whole female patient/female doctor thing and because male pediatricians aren't all that common), I doubt it'd be huge. Different for each man and all, but the female=mother instinct is hard to throw off, methinks.
would there be a pride/embarrassment thing with male doctors too?
*snort* Refusing to drop trou because they think the male doctor will judge the size of their manparts? I think they'd feel they'd get something of the same judging from women, you know?
Tis not like most guys go to the doctor regularly anyway, sadly. Probably for these very reasons--they can't go to a female or a male comfortably.